Ground fault detector

ABSTRACT

An apparatus includes an interruption circuit in a power delivery path, and a fault detection circuit configured to provide a fault signal to selectively cause the interruption circuit to interrupt power delivery, wherein the fault detection circuit includes a fault detection integrated circuit and a sensing coil configured to sense a differential current between a phase conductive path and a neutral conductive path in the power delivery path. A processor is configured to selectively control a fault simulation circuit to simulate a fault in the power delivery path, detect a response of the fault detection circuit to the simulated fault, and determine if the response of the fault detection circuit is an expected response. The processor provides an override signal to the interruption circuit to prevent the interruption circuit from receiving a fault signal from the fault detection circuit during, and for a predetermined time after, the simulated fault.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/262,411 filed Apr. 25, 2014 to Ostrovsky et al., titled “Ground FaultDetector with Self-Test” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application62/044,710 filed Sep. 2, 2014 to Ostrovsky et al., titled “Ground FaultDetector,” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference intheir entirety.

BACKGROUND

A category of line monitors, such as power line monitors, includes theGround Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI). To be commercially sold in theUnited States a GFCI should preferably be able to pass testing performedin accordance with Underwriter's Laboratory (UL) standards. For example,UL standard UL948 requires, among other things, that power beinterrupted within a certain amount of time if a fault current levelrelated to one of the electrical conductors (such as leakage currentfrom one or more electrical conductors to ground) exceeds a specifiedthreshold, and that power not be interrupted if a fault current is belowanother specified threshold. New techniques are needed to satisfyincreasingly rigorous standards.

SUMMARY

One embodiment is an apparatus including an interruption circuitelectrically connected in a power delivery path, the power delivery pathincluding a phase conductive path and a neutral conductive path, and afault detection circuit coupled to the interruption circuit andconfigured to provide a fault signal to selectively cause theinterruption circuit to interrupt power delivery in at least one of thephase conductive path and the neutral conductive path, wherein the faultdetection circuit includes a sensing coil configured to sense adifferential current between the phase conductive path and the neutralconductive path, and further includes a comparator-type fault detectionintegrated circuit that compares the differential current to athreshold. The apparatus further includes a fault simulation circuit;and a processor coupled to the fault simulation circuit and the faultdetection circuit. The processor is configured to selectively controlthe fault simulation circuit to simulate a fault in the power deliverypath, detect a response of the fault detection circuit to the simulatedfault, and determine if the response of the fault detection circuit isan expected response. The processor provides an override signal to theinterruption circuit to prevent the interruption circuit from receivinga fault signal from the fault detection circuit during, and for apredetermined time after, the simulated fault.

The processor may be powered from the line side conductors. In someembodiments, the processor may be configured to receive an indicationthat the fault detection circuit has provided the fault signal, receivean indication that a reset button has been pushed, initiate a self-testincluding a fault simulation, and if the self-test passes, provide arelease signal to an electronic switch component to unlatch and therebyallow the interruption circuit to remove an interruption of powerdelivery; and if the self-test does not pass, prevent the interruptioncircuit from removing the interruption of power delivery.

The apparatus may further include a silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR),wherein power delivery is interrupted by the latching of the SCR in aconductive state in response to a received fault signal, and wherein theSCR is powered from a rectified power signal, or from an alternatingcurrent power line, such that the SCR may only be latched during onepower half-cycle. The processor is configured for this implementation toreceive an indication that a manual reset button has been pushed, andinitiate a self-test including self-testing in two power half-cycles ofopposite polarity to ensure that the SCR will latch in response to afault signal received during a self-test in one of the two powerhalf-cycles.

The apparatus may further include a rectifier, wherein the processor isconfigured to, prior to initiating a fault simulation, determine therate of zero crossings of an amplitude of the output of the rectifier toidentify a failure of a component in the rectifier, and if a failure ofa component in the rectifier is detected, the processor does notinitiate a fault simulation.

One embodiment is an apparatus that includes an interruption circuitelectrically connected in a power delivery path, the power delivery pathincluding a phase conductive path and a neutral conductive path, and afault detection circuit coupled to the interruption circuit andconfigured to provide a fault signal upon detection of a fault in thepower delivery path. The apparatus further includes a fault simulationcircuit which selectively causes a current imbalance between the phaseconductive path and the neutral conductive path, and a processor coupledto the fault simulation circuit and the fault detection circuit. Theprocessor is configured to selectively control the fault simulationcircuit to cause a first current imbalance, such as to divert an amountof current from one of the phase conductive path and the neutralconductive path to simulate a fault, during a first power half-cycle,and detect a response of the fault detection circuit to the simulatedfault.

The processor may selectively control the fault simulation circuit tocause the first current imbalance, such as by diverting an amount ofcurrent, starting at a predetermined time after the beginning of thefirst power half-cycle. The processor may selectively control the faultsimulation circuit to cause a second current imbalance between the phaseconductive path and the neutral conductive path during a second powerhalf-cycle. The first power half-cycle and the second power half-cyclemay have approximately opposite polarity. The end of the first powerhalf-cycle and the beginning of the second power half-cycle may beseparated in time by an even number of power half-cycles. The firstpower half-cycle may randomly be either a positive polarity or anegative polarity. The processor may control the fault simulationcircuit to create the first current imbalance during a portion of thefirst power half-cycle and to cause the second current imbalance duringa portion of the second power half-cycle, each portion beginning severalmilliseconds after the start of the respective half-cycle.

One embodiment is an apparatus that includes an interruption circuitelectrically connected in a power delivery path, the power delivery pathincluding a phase conductive path and a neutral conductive path, and afault detection circuit coupled to the interruption circuit andconfigured to provide a fault signal to selectively cause theinterruption circuit to interrupt power delivery in at least one of thephase conductive path and the neutral conductive path. The apparatusfurther includes a fault simulation circuit, and a processor coupled tothe fault simulation circuit and the fault detection circuit. Theprocessor selectively controls the fault simulation circuit to simulatea fault in the power delivery path and detect a response of the faultdetection circuit to the simulated fault. A power circuit of theapparatus includes a solenoid coil, a rectifier, and a first resistor inparallel with the solenoid coil, wherein the processor and the faultdetection circuit are powered from a line side of the power deliverypath via the solenoid coil and rectifier, and the resistor is sized suchthat, if the solenoid coil is damaged, the resistor will not allowsufficient power for proper operation of both the processor and thefault detection circuit.

The apparatus may include a trigger circuit and a second resistorpositioned between the fault detection circuit and the trigger circuit,wherein the processor is further configured to monitor a voltage acrossthe second resistor during a simulated fault, and determine from anamplitude of the voltage whether the value of a resistance of the secondresistor is within acceptable limits.

One embodiment is an apparatus that includes a connection device,preferably a switching device, that electrically connects line sideconductors to load side conductors; a fault detection circuit to detectfaults related to the load side conductors; and a processor thatinitiates and controls a simulation of a load side conductor fault anddetermines whether the fault detection circuit detects the resultingsimulated fault. The fault detection circuit includes a sensing coilconfigured to sense a differential current between two line sideconductors; and a comparator-type fault detection integrated circuitthat compares the differential current to a threshold. The processor maybe powered from the line side conductors. The processor may testcomponents of the fault detection circuit for proper operation.

The apparatus may further include a solenoid coil, a rectifier, and aresistor in parallel with the solenoid coil, wherein the processor andthe fault detection circuit are powered from the line side conductorsvia the solenoid coil and rectifier, and the resistor is sized suchthat, if the solenoid coil is damaged, the resistor will not allowsufficient power for proper operation of both the processor and thefault detection circuit.

The apparatus may further include a trigger circuit that causes theconnection device to electrically disconnect the line side conductorsfrom the load side conductors. A resistor may be positioned between thefault detection circuit and the trigger circuit; and the processormonitors a voltage across the resistor during a simulated fault anddetermines from an amplitude of the voltage whether the value of aresistance of the resistor is within acceptable limits. The triggercircuit may include an electronic switch component, and when a faultsignal is received by the electronic switch component from the faultdetection circuit or the processor, the electronic switch componentactivates and latches, the activation causing the connection device toelectrically disconnect the line side conductors from the load sideconductors. The processor may provide an override signal to theelectronic switch component to prevent the electronic switch componentfrom receiving a fault signal from the fault detection circuit during,and for a predetermined time after, the fault simulation. A reset buttonmay become operational after the electronic switch component activatesand latches thereby causing the connection device to electricallydisconnect the line side conductors from the load side conductors, suchthat when the processor receives an indication that the reset button hasbeen pushed, the processor initiates a self-test including a faultsimulation.

The apparatus may further include a rectifier, and the processor, priorto initiating a fault simulation, determines the rate of zero crossingsof an amplitude of the output of the rectifier to identify a failure ofa component in the rectifier, and if a failure of a component in therectifier is detected, the processor does not initiate a faultsimulation.

The apparatus may further include a visual indicator, wherein the visualindicator is a first color when power is present on the load sideconductors, and changes to a second color to indicate improper operationof the apparatus or a fault related to the load side conductors. Thevisual indicator may be a multi-color light-emitting diode. The visualindicator may be the output of a light pipe, and the apparatus mayinclude a first light emitting diode (LED) powered by the load sideconductors and emitting the first color; and a second LED powered by theline side conductors and controlled by the processor, the second LEDemitting a third color; and the light pipe is configured to provide acombination of light from the first LED and the second LED as the visualindicator, and the second color is provided by a combination of thefirst color and the third color.

The processor may selectively cause an introduction of a currentimbalance between two line side conductors, such as by controlling adiversion of current from a line side conductor, during a faultsimulation. The processor may cause the introduction of a first currentimbalance during a portion of a first power half-cycle and subsequentlycause the introduction of a second current imbalance during a portion ofa second power half-cycle. The first power half-cycle and the secondpower half-cycle may be separated in time by at least one powerhalf-cycle. The first power half-cycle and the second power half-cyclemay have approximately opposite polarity. For example, the time betweenthe end of the first half-cycle and the beginning of the secondhalf-cycle may be approximately zero, two, four, or other even number ofhalf-cycles. The first power half-cycle may be randomly either apositive polarity or a negative polarity. The portion of the first powerhalf-cycle and the portion of the second power half-cycle may each beginseveral milliseconds after the start of the respective half-cycle.

In some implementations, the apparatus further includes a diversionswitch (e.g., a fault simulation switch), a first diode, a second diode,and a resistor. The processor controls the diversion by controlling thediversion switch. An anode of the first diode is electrically connectedto a neutral conductor; an anode of the second diode is electricallyconnected to a power phase conductor; cathodes of the first diode andthe second diode are electrically connected to a first end of theresistor; and the second end of the resistor is electrically connectedto the diversion switch.

The processor may initiate a simulation the line side conductor fault atselective times based on the expiration of a timer. The processor maytransition from a low power state to a higher power state upon theexpiration of the timer. The timer may be internal or external to theprocessor. The expiration of the timer may generate an interrupt to theprocessor.

The apparatus may further include a manual test/reset input mechanism.When a request for a manual reset is received at the manual reset inputmechanism, the processor initiates a fault simulation. Before or afterthe processor initiates a fault simulation, the processor may initiate atest of one or more components in the apparatus.

The processor may initiate a fault simulation when power is initiallyprovided to the processor.

The apparatus may include a diode clamp across the sensing coil.

In one embodiment, an apparatus includes an interruption circuitelectrically connected in a power delivery path, the power delivery pathincluding a phase conductive path and a neutral conductive path. Theapparatus further includes an SCR coupled to the interruption circuitand configured to cause the interruption circuit to interrupt powerdelivery in at least one of the phase conductive path and the neutralconductive path. The apparatus further includes a fault detectioncircuit coupled to the SCR and configured to provide a first triggersignal to the SCR, wherein the fault detection circuit includes asensing coil configured to sense a differential current between thephase conductive path and the neutral conductive path, and acomparator-type fault detection IC that compares the differentialcurrent to a threshold. The apparatus further includes a processorcoupled to the fault detection circuit and to the SCR, wherein theprocessor is configured to: identify when the fault detection circuitprovides the first trigger signal, and provide a second trigger signalto the SCR at a subsequent time. The processor may further be configuredto determine whether the SCR is able to cause the interruption circuitto interrupt power delivery upon receipt of the first trigger signal.

The determination of whether the SCR is able to cause the interruptioncircuit to interrupt power delivery may include a determination ofwhether the SCR is capable of being latched during a power half-cycle inwhich the first trigger signal is provided. The determination of whetherthe SCR is able to cause the interruption circuit to interrupt powerdelivery may include a determination of whether a voltage at the anodeof the SCR is above a threshold. The determination of whether the SCR isable to cause the interruption circuit to interrupt power delivery mayinclude a determination of whether a voltage of the phase conductivepath is in a positive half-cycle or a negative half-cycle.

The processor may be further configured to monitor voltage or current ofat least one circuit, wherein the determination of whether the SCR isable to cause the interruption circuit to interrupt power deliveryincludes a determination of whether there is a change in the monitoredvoltage or current.

The subsequent time may be during an opposite-polarity half-cycle of thephase conductive path following the half-cycle in which the firsttrigger signal is provided to the SCR.

The first trigger signal and second trigger signal may be received bythe SCR through the same circuit. Alternatively, the first triggersignal and second trigger signal may be received by the SCR throughdifferent circuits.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Other features will become apparent from the following detaileddescription considered in connection with the accompanying drawings. Itis to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed forillustration and not as a definition of the limits of the invention. Inthe drawings, similar reference characters denote similar elementsthroughout the several views.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram representation of one embodiment of a GFCIaccording to this disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of one embodiment of a GFCI accordingto this disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of another embodiment of a GFCIaccording to this disclosure.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a light pipe.

FIGS. 5A-5B are light directivity diagrams for two example LEDs.

FIG. 6 illustrates one embodiment of a GFCI including a light pipe.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating some features of a GFCI 100according to the teachings in this disclosure. FIG. 1 is presented byway of example for the purpose of discussion only, and is not to beinterpreted as limiting the variations that may exist in the structureand/or function of GFCI 100. Examples of implementations of GFCI 100will be described with respect to circuit diagrams in FIGS. 2 and 3.Other implementations will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in theart, and are encompassed in the concepts described in this disclosure.

Blocks in FIG. 1 generally represent functionality of one or moreelectronic or electromechanical components, including analog and/ordigital electronic components, where digital components may includeprocessing components that execute software and/or firmwareinstructions. The placement of the blocks with respect to each other isnot necessarily representative of the physical placement of thecorresponding components within GFCI 100. The blocks in FIG. 1 also donot signify any necessary physical division of components. Functionalityof one block may be performed by components of another block. Thus, theblocks indicate functionality of physical components and not necessarilyphysical implementation.

Arrows in FIG. 1 are included to indicate directionality for the limitedpurpose of visually aiding in the understanding of some functionality ofthe blocks in FIG. 1. However, functionality is by no means limited bythe directionality illustrated.

GFCI 100 is positioned in a path of power delivery to monitor theelectrical conductors (referred to as “conductors” herein, and includingphase and neutral conductors) delivering the power. The conductors aremonitored for load-side faults such as ground faults (e.g., a full orpartial short circuit of any one of the conductors to a groundpotential) and cross-conductor faults (e.g., a full or partial shortcircuit between two or more conductors).

Line side conductors 105/110 traverse a portion of GFCI 100. Load sideconductors 115/120 also traverse a portion of GFCI 100. In the case inwhich GFCI 100 is a terminating electrical outlet, the load sideconductors 115/120 represent wiring to the outlet plugs, and also wiringbetween the outlet plugs and attached load(s). In the case in which GFCI100 is a non-terminating outlet, load side conductors 115/120additionally represent downstream wiring, including wiring to additionalloads. In some implementations, GFCI 100 may not include an electricaloutlet, and load side conductors 115/120 represent downstream wiring,including wiring to loads.

GFCI 100 includes a reset button 125, providing a signal 126 to aprocessor 150, and a test button 130 optionally providing a signal 131to processor 150. GFCI 100 also includes a visual/audio indicator 135,controlled by one or more signals 136 from processor 150. Reset button125, test button 130, and visual/audio indicator 135 (with theirrespective signals) will be described below in the context of their use.

A fault detection circuit 140 monitors line side conductors 105/110 todetect faults on load side conductors 115/120. Fault detection circuit140 may include one or more coils adjacent to or surrounding one or moreof the line side conductors 105/110. A fault in a load side conductor115/120 is detected in fault detection circuit 140 by analyzing currentsinduced in the one or more coils. For example, fault detection circuit140 may include an integrated circuit designed to perform such ananalysis. When a fault is detected, fault detection circuit 140 providesa signal 141 via a circuit component 142 (e.g., a resistor) as a signal143 to an electronic switching component 144, which controls adouble-pole, single throw electromechanical switching component 145,which responds by disconnecting load side conductors 115/120 from lineside conductors 105/110. Electromechanical switching component 145 issubsequently held open mechanically until manually released.

Processor 150 is powered from line side conductors 105/110, allowingprocessor 150 to function even when load side conductors 115/120 aredisconnected from line side conductors 105/110. In one embodiment,powering processor 150 from line side conductors 105/110 allowsprocessor 150 to function prior to the connection of load sideconductors 115/120 to line side conductors 105/110 at startup or reset,thereby allowing processor 150 to power up to a functioning state, andthen initiate and control a GFCI 100 self-test, within a prescribed timelimit (e.g., five seconds) required by an applicable UL standard such asUL948.

Processor 150 controls the GFCI 100 self-test, causing a load side faultto be simulated by applying a low impedance on one or more of the lineside conductors 105/110 and detecting an appropriate response from faultdetection circuit 140 by way of monitoring signal 141. The simulatedload side fault is introduced by way of fault simulator 155.

Fault simulator 155 responds to a signal 152 from processor 150 byactivating electronic or electromechanical components in such a way asto cause it to appear that a fault exists on at least one of load sideconductors 115/120. For example, fault simulator 155 may divert aportion of current from a line side conductor 105/110 to cause adifference between the current in different line side conductors105/110. If fault detection circuit 140 detects the simulated fault andasserts signal 141 in response within a predefined time limit, processor150 identifies that the self-test of the line side conductors 105/110 issuccessful. If, however, the test is not successfully completed, such asif fault detection circuit 140 does not assert signal 141, or does notassert signal 141 within a predefined time frame, processor 150recognizes a failure of the self-test. To prevent a disruption in powerduring the test due to fault detection circuit 140 correctly detecting asimulated fault and causing electromechanical switching component 145 toopen (i.e., by asserting signal 141 to electronic switching component144), processor 150 provides a signal 151 to electronic switchingcomponent 144 to override signal 143. The terms “asserting” and “assert”in the context of a signal indicate providing an appropriate voltage,current, frequency (or other signal property) that indicates an activestate of the signal. The active state may be, in one example, active low(e.g., 0-0.2 V) or active high (e.g., 0.8-1.0 V).

As a result of detecting a self-test failure, processor 150 may followinstructions to perform one or more of: storing an indication ofself-test failure (e.g., in a memory device), transmitting an indicationof self-test failure (e.g., via a wireless communication link or viapower line communications to an external device), controllingvisual/audio indicator 135 via signal 136 to indicate the failure, andcontrolling electromechanical switching component 145 to disconnect loadside connectors 115/120 from line side connectors 105/110. An indicationof self-test failure may include one or more of an indication of theoccurrence, an indication of the specific test(s) that failed, a timestamp, a date stamp, or other information.

A self-test may include one or more self-test events. A single self-testevent includes processor 150 asserting signal 152 to cause simulation ofa fault by fault simulator 155, and monitoring signal 141 for detectionof the fault by fault detection circuit 140. A self-test event may becontrolled to selectively occur partway through a half cycle (e.g.,after a certain percentage of the cycle period, or after a certaintime). A self-test event may be timed to occur in a half cycle betweenzero crossings of the amplitude of the power in line side conductors105/110. A self-test event may be timed to occur in a positive halfcycle or in a negative half cycle. A self-test event may be timed tooccur between zero crossings but randomly with respect to polarity, suchthat the self-test event occurs randomly in either a positive ornegative half cycle. The ability to perform a self-test in a randompolarity half-cycle allows for less processing time needed for aself-test event, in that it is not necessary to wait for a specificpolarity of the power line. This ability is advantageous at initialstartup to meet UL standard requirements for self-test within a certaintime (e.g., within three seconds). Between self-tests, processor 150 mayenter a low power state. Examples of low power states include wait,sleep, and halt states. The ability to perform a self-test in a randompolarity half-cycle further allows processor 150 to enter a low powerstate sooner and thus consume less energy.

A self-test event initiated by processor 150 is generally preceded byprocessor 150 providing an override on signal 151 to preventdisconnection of load side conductors 115/120 from line side conductors105/110, and may be succeeded by processor 150 releasing the override onsignal 151. After releasing signal 152 to fault simulator 155 to end asimulated fault, processor 150 may delay a short time (e.g., 1 ms, 1-2ms, 1-5 ms, 2-5 ms, 2 ms, 3, ms, 4 ms, 5 ms, etc.) prior to releasingthe override on signal 151, to allow time for system settling. In aself-test event initiated by the manual push of reset button 125,processor 150 does not provide an override on signal 151.

In some embodiments, a self-test includes two or more self-test events.The two or more self-test events may be, but are not necessarily,separated by one or more half-cycles.

In one implementation, a self-test includes two self-test eventsperformed on two different polarity half-cycles. This is beneficial, forexample, to avoid incorrect detection of a fault or incorrect self-testfailure, such as in the situation in which there are low-current faultspresent but below a threshold (e.g., a standard requires there to be nofault detected for low-current faults measured at less than or equal to4 mA). As an example: if the normal differential current caused by faultsimulator 155 is 8 mA, and a 4 mA fault is already present (which aloneshould not be identified as a fault under certain standards), in a halfcycle in which the 8 mA and 4 mA are subtractive, a differential currentof less than the fault detection threshold may be measured such that thesimulated fault is not detected; thus, the self-test would fail. In theopposite polarity half cycle, however, the applied 8 mA simulated faultand the existing 4 mA fault are additive, and a differential currentgreater than 8 mA (i.e., greater than the fault detection threshold) ismeasured such that the simulated fault is detected; thus, the self-testwould pass. In general, if a self-test were performed only during aparticular polarity half-cycle (whether it was a single half-cycle ormultiple half-cycles of the same polarity) erroneous results could ensueand either the self-test would incorrectly fail or an actual powerlinefault might not be detected. Therefore, performing self-test events inboth (i.e., opposite) polarity half cycles allows for more accuratedetection of faults and more accurate self-test results than performingone self-test event, or performing multiple self-test events insame-polarity half-cycles. Thus, in some embodiments, a self-test mayinclude a first self-test event, and if a fault is detected in the firstself-test event, a second self-test event may be performed in anopposite polarity half-cycle, such that a fault must also be detected inthe opposite polarity half-cycle before a self-test failure isdetermined.

The two self-test events on different polarity half-cycles as describedmay be performed on adjacent half-cycles or non-adjacent half-cycles.For example, two self-test events may be on a first and secondhalf-cycle, a first and a fourth half-cycle, a first and a sixthhalf-cycle, etc. More generally for any self-test including multipleself-test events, the self-test events may be performed in adjacenthalf-cycles or non-adjacent half-cycles (i.e., self-test eventsseparated by one or more half-cycles).

In some cases, separation of the self-test events may be necessary tomeet the requirements of a standard. For example, if a self-testincluding two or more self-test events is of a duration longer than theUL requirement for detecting a fault, the self-test events may beseparated by one or more half cycles. Between self-test events,processor 150 stops asserting signal 151, thereby allowingelectromechanical switching component 145 to react when actual failuresdetected by fault detection circuit 140 result in circuit 140 assertingsignal 141 to disconnect load side conductors 115/120 from line sideconductors 105/110. This spreading of the self-test over two or moreself-test events may be beneficial for meeting certain UL specificationsrequiring a reduced detection time for actual faults with higher faultcurrents.

Additionally, in an implementation in which the simulated fault current(e.g., self-test current diversion) is always applied in synchronismwith the phase conductor of line side conductors 105/110 (e.g., see thedescription of FIGS. 2 and 3), if a self-test were to be performed asone self-test event spanning two or more half-cycles, the amplitude ofeach half-cycle would be affected in the same way. A transformer used tomeasure differential current would filter out the direct current (DC)component, and thus the root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude of thedifferential current caused by the self-test event would be lower thanif the simulated fault were applied only during one half-cycle. Thesimulated fault current would need to be increased to increase thedifferential RMS current; however, an increase in simulated faultcurrent may not be allowed under the standard. It may be beneficial insome implementations, therefore, to use multiple self-test events, eachoccurring within only one half-cycle rather than a single self-testevent spanning multiple half-cycles.

Zero crossings may be detected by monitoring amplitude on line sideconductors 105/110. For example, in one embodiment, a rectified versionof an AC waveform on line side conductors 105/110 is monitored to detectzero crossings of the rectified waveform. The zero crossings may be usedto identify when to perform a line side conductor 105/110 self-test. Forexample, it may be desirable to perform a self-test within a half-cycle,and not while the phase is changing (e.g., at a zero crossing). In sucha case, a self-test is initiated after a zero crossing is detected. Aself-test may be initiated at any time within a half-cycle. If, however,it is desired that the self-test not extend over a zero crossing phasechange, then a self-test is initiated within a half-cycle such that theself-test will end prior to the next zero crossing.

Zero crossings may be used to determine frequency and phase, which maybe used to determine start times for self-test events. If the frequencyof the power lines is known and stable, and the duration of theself-test is known, self-tests may be scheduled for a future time basedon detection of zero crossings.

The ability to know the duration of a self-test is made possible by theuse of a comparator-type fault detection circuit. Previous GFCI designsused integrator-type fault detection circuits, and the amount of timerequired to detect a fault was dependent on the amplitude of thefault—the integration of a fault of large amplitude would exceed athreshold more quickly than the integration of a fault of relativelysmall amplitude. In a comparator-type fault detection circuit, theamplitude is not integrated, but compared directly (or after somefiltering) to a threshold, making the determination of a fault generallyquicker, and making the duration of a self-test event substantiallypredictable.

A UL standard may require that a self-test be performed within a certaintime. For example, a requirement may be that, following the initialpower-up, a self-test must be performed every three hours. More frequentself-tests may be performed, such as every minute, every fifteenminutes, every half hour, every hour, every two hours, randomly at leastevery 3 hours, at the occurrence of an event, etcetera. A timer may beprogrammed to indicate a next time for self-test. In one implementation,a timer is set to provide an indication periodically (e.g., every hour).In another implementation, a timer is set to provide one indication atsome time in the future (e.g., five minutes), and the timer is reset atexpiration. When a timer expires, processor 150 may receive anindication of the expiration. For example, if the timer is external toprocessor 150, the indication of expiration may be the timer assertingan input pin of processor 150, or sending a message to processor 150 viaa communication link. In some embodiments, the indication may cause aninterrupt to occur in the execution of instructions by processor 150. Insome embodiments, processor 150 may be in a low power state (which maybe one of several low power states available in processor 150) when theindication is received, and the indication causes processor 150 toascend to a higher power state (which may be another of several lowpower states) to perform various functions, such as initiating aself-test. By operating in a low power state between self-tests, GFCI100 saves energy.

In addition to self-testing events performed by applying simulatedfaults to line side conductors 105/110, processor 150 may also test oneor more electronic or electromechanical components of GFCI 100. Forexample, components of fault detection circuit 140, fault simulator 155,circuit component 142, and power supply components may be tested, amongothers. Some examples are provided below with respect to theimplementation illustrated by the circuit schematic in FIG. 2.

A self-test may be initiated manually by pushing test button 130followed by pushing reset button 125, both provided on the GFCI housing.Pushing test button 130 forces a mechanical disconnection of thecontacts of electromechanical switching component 145. The mechanicaldisconnection is latched, and released only when reset button 125 ispushed then released, and only if a self-test initiated by the pushingof reset button 125 passes. When reset button 125 is pushed, signal 126is received by processor 150, which in turn initiates a self-test ofGFCI 100 as described above, by asserting signal 152 to fault simulator155, and monitoring signal 141 from fault detection circuit 140. Theself-test may include multiple self-test events, as described above. Insome embodiments, provision of an override on signal 151 may precede themanually-initiated self-test or a self-test event, and release of theoverride may succeed the self-test or a self-test event (with optionaldelay), as described above for non-manually-initiated self-tests.However, the override on signal 151 may be withheld during amanually-initiated self-test, so that a true fault (not simulated) keepsthe contacts of electromechanical switching component 145 open, and sothat a successful manually-initiated self-test allows the contacts ofelectromechanical switching component 145 to close when reset button 125is released.

Thus, a manually initiated self-test is performed in the same manner,using the same fault simulator 155 and fault detection circuit 140, as aprocessor 150 initiated self-test. The manually initiated test may alsoinclude testing of various components in the GFCI, as discussed above.In some implementations, the manual test button 130 may be pressed atany time. In other implementations, the manual test button 130 may bepressed only while load side conductors 115/120 and line side conductors105/110 are disconnected, or alternatively only while load sideconductors 115/120 and line side conductors 105/110 are connected, witha mechanical mechanism preventing a manual button push at other times.

Reset button 125 may be equipped with a mechanical mechanism preventinga manual button push when load side conductors 115/120 and line sideconductors 105/110 are connected. In such a case, a reset button 125signal 126 is received by processor 150 only when load side conductors115/120 and line side conductors 105/110 are disconnected.

GFCI 100 includes visual and/or audio indicator 135 to provide an alertwhen a fault is detected on line side conductors 105/110, or when aself-test failed. For example, visual/audio indicator 135 may includeone or more lights (including light-emitting diodes (LEDs)), a speaker,a vibrator, a display, or other visual and/or audio indicator, or acombination of visual and/or audio indicators.

It may be beneficial to have an LED connected between the contacts ofload side conductors 115 and 120 (e.g., between load phase and neutralcontacts). When GFCI 100 is wired correctly, this LED indicates thepresence of power at load contacts (terminals). But when GFCI 100 ismis-wired so that load side contacts are wired to line side conductors105/110 and the line side contacts are wired to load side conductors115/120, the LED may indicate the mis-wiring by failing to turn on, orby remaining on when GFCI 100 is in a tripped state.

It may also be beneficial to have an LED controlled by processor 150 toindicate a self-test failure and therefore possible conditions when itis may be dangerous to use GFCI 100.

In some embodiments, visual/audio indicator 135 provides a green LEDload side power indicator and a red LED failure indicator. However, itmay be confusing for the user to see both the green and red LEDs on atthe same time. To avoid confusion, the green power LED may be turned offwhen the red failure LED is turned on, but this requires isolationbetween line and load side (GFCI 100 should provide dielectric isolationof about 2000 V between line and load when tripped), such as theaddition of mechanical or optoelectronic isolation, increasing cost andreducing reliability of GFCI 100. To avoid these complications, a lightpipe may be used to mix the green and red LED colors. Thus, when the redfailure indicator LED is off, the user sees green, and when the redfailure indicator LED is on, the more intense red light overpowers thegreen light and the user sees red. This approach does not requireadditional components for isolation.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of an embodiment of a visual indicator 400in which a light pipe 410 is used to direct light from LED 420 and LED430 towards a user visible portion 440 of the light pipe 410. Light fromLEDs 420 and 430 is directed by the geometry of the light pipe at anangle, as indicated by dotted line 425 and solid line 435, respectively.The light is directed according to the shape of a bottom surface 450 oflight pipe 410 and/or the shape of the interior surface of light pipe410. Bottom surface 450 may be a convex or concave lens, for example,and bottom surface 450 or other portion of light pipe 410 may include afaceted surface, diffractive element, prismatic element or other opticalelement. The directing of the light provides a mixing of the wavelengthsof light from the two LEDs 420 and 430, avoiding “hot” spots of a singlecolor at user visible portion 440 when both LEDs 420 and 430 areactivated. The light pipe illustrated in FIG. 4 is provided by way ofexample, and not as a limitation. Many other light pipe shapes andLED/light pipe configurations and are also possible within the scope ofthis disclosure.

FIGS. 5A-5B illustrate relative intensity versus radiation angle, by wayof example for a red LED and a green LED, respectively, showing that themaximum intensity of light is at the center of the LED. It may bepreferable for less than the maximum intensity to be presented at uservisible portion 440. The directing of the light as shown for the exampleof FIG. 4 shifts the light from the centers of LEDs 420 and 430 awayfrom a direct path to user visible portion 440.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of one embodiment of a GFCI according tothe present disclosure, with light pipe 410 including user visibleportion 440, and LEDs 420 and 430.

More generally, in one implementation, visual/audio indicator 135includes a visual indicator in the form of a light pipe and one or moreLEDs, and signal 136 represents control signals for the one or more LEDsfrom the following set: a first LED that is a first color (e.g., blue)and is used to indicate when power is present at line side conductors105/110; a second LED that is a second color (e.g., yellow) and is usedto indicate when power is present at load side conductors 115/120; and athird LED that is a third color (e.g., red) and used to indicate when aself-test failure or a component failure has occurred. If all three ofthe example LEDs are used, when GFCI 100 is operating properly, thefirst color and second color would be combined in the light pipe (e.g.,blue/yellow); whereas, if a self-test or component failure occurs, thefirst color, second, and third color would be combined in the light pipe(e.g., blue/yellow/red); and after detecting a fault condition, thefirst color (e.g., blue) or the first and third colors (e.g., blue/red)would be present in the light pipe. In some implementations, LEDs may beselected, and the light pipe designed, such that one color ispredominant over the other color(s) when the LEDs are on, and thepredominant color is visible at the end of the light pipe. One or moreof the LEDs could be turned on and off, such that the color appearing atthe end of the light pipe would alternate between two colors (e.g.,flashing the red LED such that the color alternates between blue/yellowand blue/yellow/red).

In one implementation, visual/audio indicator 135 includes avariable-colored LED, which may be controlled to indicate a presentstatus of GFCI 100.

In one implementation, visual/audio indicator 135 includes a visualindicator in the form of multiple lights (e.g., LEDs or other smalldevice that emits light), each light indicating the status of adifferent circuit, component, or self-test.

In one implementation, visual/audio indicator 135 includes a visualindicator in the form of an LCD screen or other electronic display, inwhich icons and/or text are used to indicate the status of variouscircuits, components, or self-tests.

In one implementation, visual/audio indicator 135 includes a visualindicator that provides a distinctive visual display for line sideconductor 105/110 self-test failures versus detected faults detected byfault detection circuit 140. For example, a colored LED (e.g., red) maybe driven to emit visually continuous light to represent a detectedfault, and the LED may be flashed to represent a line side conductor105/110 self-test failure. Other schemes using one or more visualindicators may alternatively be used, including, for example, a visualdisplay that distinguishes component self-test failures from faults andline side conductor 105/110 self-test failures.

In one implementation, self-test failure indication includes transientfailure forgiveness: more than one self-test failure must occur beforeindication of a self-test failure by visual/audio indicator 135, and apredetermined time without self-test failures may cause a self-testfailure indication to be removed. For example, a counter may beincreased at each self-test failure and decreased once each second, andan indication made if the counter crosses a first threshold as itincreases, and the indication removed if the counter crosses thatthreshold or another threshold as the count decreases.

In one implementation, if a first self-test fails, a next self-test canbe performed for a shorter duration than normal to verify the failuredetection and avoid false tripping caused, for example, by temporaryconditions on the power line.

In addition to providing status information visually and/or audibly byway of controlling visual/audio indicator 135, processor 150 may providestatus information (e.g., fault, failure, proper operation, tripped,etc.) via a wired or wireless communication link (including power linecommunication) to an external device either on the premises or remotefrom the premises.

Having described generally the operation of GFCI 100 in accordance withthis disclosure, one specific example is next described.

FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram representing one embodiment of a GFCI inaccordance with this disclosure. The circuit diagram describeselectrical connections between components in a GFCI 200 but is notintended to be illustrative of physical size, dimension, or placement ofthe components. GFCI 200 is generally positioned within a housing (notshown) to isolate the electrical circuits from human contact. GFCI 200may be incorporated within another electronic device, and as such mayshare a housing with the other electronic device. GFCI 200 may includeadditional components and functionality than is illustrated anddescribed with respect to FIG. 2.

In GFCI 200, line side conductors 202 and 204 represent line sideneutral and a phase conductor, respectively, that traverse GFCI 200 froma physical entry point on the housing of GFCI 200 to one side of a relay206. In particular, line side neutral conductor 202 connects to relay206 at electrical contact 206A, and line side phase conductor 204connects to relay 206 at electrical contact 206B. Power is sourcedthrough line side conductors 202/204.

Load side conductors 208 and 210 extend from relay 206 to a physicalexit point or points on the housing of GFCI 200 (e.g., terminating atoutlet plugs and/or extending through holes in the housing). Inparticular, load side conductor 208 connects to relay 206 at electricalcontact 206C, and load side conductor 210 connects to relay 206 atelectrical contact 206D.

Relay 206 may include additional contacts beyond those illustrated toconnect multiple load side conduits 208/210, and may in someimplementations be multiple relays 206.

When the contacts of relay 206 are closed, there is an electricalconnection between points 206A and 206C such that line side neutralconductor 202 is electrically connected to load side conductor 208, andan electrical connection between points 206B and 206D such that lineside phase conductor 204 is electrically connected to load sideconductor 210. In this manner, control of relay 206 allows for selectiveconnection/disconnection of line side conductors 202/204 from load sideconductors 208/210.

Relay 206 is controlled by way of a solenoid. When sufficient currentflows through the solenoid coil, an electromechanical mechanism forcesthe contacts of relay 206 apart, thereby opening the electricalconnection between points 206A and 206C and the electrical connectionbetween points 206B and 206D. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2,the solenoid coil is shown as coil L1. Under normal operating conditions(i.e., no fault), the current flowing through L1 is not sufficient tocause the electromechanical mechanism to force the contacts of relay 206open. When a fault condition is detected, sufficient current is causedto flow through L1 to open the contacts of relay 206, as describedbelow.

A current detection device 212 detects current flowing through one orboth of conductors 202/204. Examples of detecting current usingdifferent coil configurations are provided in co-pending U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 14/089,700 filed Nov. 25, 2013, published asUS2014/0218044. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, current detection device212 includes two coils 212A and 212B. Coil 212A is used to detectgrounded neutral conditions. Coil 212B is used to detect currentdifferential between line side conductors 202/204, and the inducedcurrent is measured by an integrated circuit 214.

IC 214 monitors the current induced in coil 212B. IC 214 is acomparator-type ground fault interrupter IC, such as, by way of example,a Fairchild Semiconductor FAN4147 ground fault interrupter or RV4141 lowpower ground fault interrupter. If IC 214 detects a fault condition, IC214 asserts an output 216. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, IC 214 assertsoutput 216 by providing a logic high level at pin 1. The assertion ofoutput 216 activates silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR) 218 via resistorR13, which in turn causes SCR 218 to latch and conduct current. When SCR218 is conducting current, the voltage at anode 218A decreases, causingsufficient current to flow through solenoid coil L1 to open theelectrical contacts of relay 206.

A processor 220 monitors output 216 of IC 214 to identify when a faulthas been detected by IC 214. Processor 220 is illustrated as aSTMicroelectronics STM8S003F3. Other processors may alternatively beused, including microcontrollers, field programmable gate arrays(FPGAs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or the like.Processor 220 uses a low frequency clock source (internal or external)to minimize power consumption. Processor 220 is powered in at leastthree states: off, low power, and normal operation power. Multiple lowpower states may be implemented, and processor 220 may perform someoperations in one low power state and other operations in another lowpower state. Power control may be achieved through circuitry external toprocessor 220 such as by way of a regulator IC, or may be achieved byself-control of processor 220.

A timer may be used to transition processor 220 from a low power stateto a higher power state. For example, a timer may be set to periodicallywake processor 220 from a low power sleep state to perform variousoperations such as self-testing GFCI 200. The timer may assert aninterrupt to processor 220 to wake up processor 220. Multiple timers maybe used. A timer may be external to processor 220, and assert theinterrupt by way of an input to processor 220. A timer may be internalto processor 220. In addition to a timer, processor 220 may have aninput connected to a manual pushbutton, which may trigger an action byprocessor 220. The action may include waking processor 220 from a lowpower state.

Processor 220 controls a fault simulation circuit 222 by way of acontrol signal 224. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, fault simulationcircuit 222 includes transistor Q1, resistor R7, and diodes D8 and D9.When processor 220 asserts a logic high on control signal 224,transistor Q1 is turned on and the cathodes of diodes D8 and D9 areconnected to a GFCI ground (e.g., neutral line side conductor 202potential). Depending on the present polarity of the current throughline side conductors 202/204, one of diodes D8 and D9 will conduct, anda small amount of current will be diverted from the respective line sideconductor 202 or 204, causing a difference between the current in lineside conductors 202/204. Processor 220 monitors output 216 at input 232to determine whether IC 214 accurately detects the simulated fault.

A self-test may be initiated by processor 220 at the expiration of atimer, at the receipt of an input indicating push of a manual button, atthe receipt of a request via a communication interface, or at othertimes in accordance with the instructions programmed into instructionmemory used by processor 220.

Prior to initiating a self-test, processor 220 generally disables SCR218 by providing a low voltage at output 226 that inhibits an assertionof output 216 from causing SCR 218 to activate. In this manner, aself-test of GFCI 200 does not cause the contacts of relay 206 to open,which would cause a disconnection of load side conductors 208/210 fromline side conductors 202/204. If a self-test fails, processor 220 maycause SCR 218 to activate and latch by providing a high voltage at oneor both of outputs 226 and 232.

Processor 220 may monitor the voltage or polarity of line sideconductors 202/204, such as via resistor R12, and initiate a self-testafter detecting a zero crossing in either direction. One advantage ofthis technique is that the self-test may be performed during either thepositive or negative half-cycle instead of waiting for a particularpolarity half-cycle. Another advantage of this technique is that theself-test may be initiated as soon as a first zero crossing is detected.These advantages allow for performing a self-test quickly at initialpower-up and thereafter. Additionally, the technique is advantageous indetecting a failure of a diode D3-D6, as discussed below.

Processor 220 may perform a self-test by initiating self-test events inone or more half cycles. If a first self-test event is not successful,meaning that IC 214 did not assert output 216 after application of thesimulated fault, processor 220 may log the self-test failure, and/orattempt another self-test in the same polarity or opposite polarityhalf-cycle (or both polarity half-cycles) to verify the fault. Processor220 may determine to indicate a self-test failure after a singlefailure, or indicate a self-test failure only after two or moreself-test failures.

Processor 220 may save information regarding the self-tests, and/orprovide information regarding the self-tests to another device by way ofa communication interface. Information regarding the self-tests mayinclude one or more of: a pass/fail indication, date, time, duration,number of self-tests, polarity of first half-cycle tested, number ofhalf or full cycles between self-tests, time between initiation of asimulated fault and detection of the simulated fault, and otherinformation useful in the monitoring of power lines.

When a self-test is completed, processor 220 de-asserts control signal224 to remove the simulated fault. In the embodiment of FIG. 2,processor 220 provides a logic low on control signal 224 which switchesoff transistor Q1. Processor 220 then removes the low voltage at output226 (e.g., by setting the output to a high-impedance state), therebyagain allowing IC 214 to activate SCR 218 through assertion of output216 upon detection of a fault. To allow for system settling followingremoval of the simulated fault, processor 220 may wait a time afterde-asserting control signal 224 before removing the low voltage atoutput 226. Such a wait time may also be used between successiveself-test events to avoid residue from one self-test event fromaffecting a subsequent self-test event.

A mechanical disconnect button (not shown) in GFCI 200 provides fordisconnection of load side conductors 208/210 from line side conductors202/204 via a mechanical device (not shown) that latches the contacts ofrelay 206 open. A reset button in GFCI 200, shown as switch SW2 in FIG.2, provides a signal to processor 220 when pushed. Processor 220responds to the signal by initiating a self-test event in the mannerdescribed above, except that processor 220 does not inhibit theactivation of SCR 218 with a low voltage on output 226. If the self-testevent passes, IC 214 detects the simulated fault and asserts output 216,causing the mechanical device to release the contacts of relay 206 suchthat the line side conductors 202/204 may be connected to load sideconductors 208/210 when SW2 is released. If the self-test event fails,IC 214 would not assert output 216, and thereby the contacts of relay206 would be held open. Thus, reset lockout is provided. Additionally,processor 220 may indicate that the self-test following the push of thereset button passed or failed, such as by causing a visual or auditoryindication, or by sending a message through a communication interface.

In addition to the self-test described using simulated fault conditions,GFCI 200 includes several mechanisms to detect component failures orother circuit failures.

Processor 220 and IC 214 are powered by line side conductors 202/204through coil L1 and rectifier 230 (illustrated in FIG. 2 by diodesD3-D6). One advantage of this configuration is improved performanceduring surge. A resistor R8 in parallel with coil L1 provides forindicating a failure of coil L1. If coil L1 is broken such that currentdoes not flow through coil L1, processor 220 and IC 214 are poweredthrough resistor R8. Resistor R8 is a high-value resistor, selected toallow insufficient current to processor 220 and IC 214 for normaloperation. For example, the value of resistor R8 may be selected toprevent operation of IC 214 and processor 220, or prevent operation ofIC 214 and allow at least partial operation of processor 220, or allowpartial operation of IC 214 and at least partial operation of processor220. In any case, the value of resistor R8 is selected such that, ifpower is being provided to IC 214 and processor 220 solely throughresistor R8, a self-test initiated by processor 220 will fail. ResistorR8 may be selected to provide sufficient power to processor 220 to logor transmit an indication of self-test failure, or to provide an audioor visual indication.

As a verification of rectifier 230, processor 220 may count the numberof zero crossings in a time interval, and compare the number of zerocrossings counted to a number of zero crossings expected. For example,in the embodiment of FIG. 2, if one of the diodes D3-D6 of rectifier 230is electrically disconnected, the normal full wave rectification willbecome half-wave rectification, and the number of zero crossingsdetected at processor 220 input 234 in a given time interval will dropby half. If a rectifier 230 failure is detected in this manner,processor 220 may determine to not perform subsequent self-testing. Inone implementation, a check of rectifier 230 precedes each self-test,and a failure of the rectifier 230 check causes the self-test to not beperformed.

If there is a failure of the zero-crossing detector circuit itself, thecheck of rectifier 230 will fail. For example, if resistor R12 is open,no zero crossings will be detected.

Processor 220 monitors resistor R13, as resistor R13 is necessary totrigger a disconnection of load side conductors 208/210 from line sideconductors 202/204 in the event of a detected fault condition. In theembodiment of FIG. 2, IC 214 includes a current source on output 216,which causes a voltage drop across resistor R13 which may be monitoredby processor 220. For example, during a self-test when a simulated faultis detected and IC 214 asserts output 216 while processor 220 provides alow voltage at output 226 to inhibit SCR 218 from activating, thevoltage drop across resistor R13 is defined by the current from output216 and the resistance of resistor R13 (e.g., approximately 0.5 V),which may be detected by processor 220 by the voltage at input 232. Ifresistor R13 is disconnected or its value changes, the change inresistance may be detected as a change in voltage at input 232—ifresistor R13 is open (i.e., disconnected or broken), no current willflow through resistor R13, and the voltage at input 232 will be thevoltage provided by IC 214 output 216 (e.g., 5 V).

Protection from power line surges is provided by components such as ametal oxide varistor (MOV) and a transient voltage suppressor (TVS), asdescribed in co-pending application U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2013/0027819.

FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram representing another embodiment of a GFCI inaccordance with this disclosure. The circuit diagram describeselectrical connections between components in a GFCI 300 but is notintended to be illustrative of physical size, dimension, or placement ofthe components. GFCI 300 is similar to GFCI 200 illustrated in FIG. 2;therefore, only relevant differences are discussed.

In GFCI 300, the circuit components of rectifier 230 in FIG. 2 arereplaced by an integrated rectifier 310; the anode 218A of SCR 218 isconnected to the AC input of rectifier 310 at point 320 rather than tothe DC output of rectifier 230 as in FIG. 2; and diode clamp 330 isadded across coil 212B.

The connection of anode 218A of SCR 218 to the AC input of rectifier 310means that SCR 218 may only be unlatched during a positive half-cycle.Thus, a self-test initiated by pushing a manual reset button (after SCR218 latches, causing relay 206 contacts to open and be mechanicallylatched) must be performed in a positive half-cycle. If cycle polarityis known, a self-test may be performed in the positive half-cycle. Ifcycle polarity is unknown, a self-test includes at least two self-testevents in opposite polarity half-cycles so that, if the self-testpasses, SCR 218 may be unlatched.

Diode clamp 330 allows for detection of more fault conditions, such asimproved detection of high current faults. Without diode clamp 330, ahigh current differential fault current causes the transformer core (ofcoils 212A and 212B) to saturate, such that a narrow pulse is induced incoil 212B which may appear as noise to the comparator-type IC and not afault condition. Diode clamp 330 shorts the coil 212B core to preventsaturation, providing a longer duration pulse that may be detected as afault condition.

In many applications, it is important to maintain connection betweenload side conductors and line side conductors unless it is consideredtoo dangerous to do so. In these applications, a failure of a self-testor a component failure by itself will not cause a disconnection of loadside conductors from line side conductors. Instead, such self-test orcomponent failures may be logged and/or transmitted via a communicationinterface, as described above. Additionally or alternatively, the GFCImay provide a local indication of self-test failure or componentfailure. A local indication may be an audible sound such as a solid orpulsating tone, a shriek, a buzzer, enunciation of words, or any othersound or combination of sounds. A local indication may be visual, suchas a solid or flashing light, an icon display, or a text display.Different local indications may be used to indicate differentconditions. For example, a flashing light may indicate a componentfailure whereas a solid light may indicate a simulated fault self-testfailure.

In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the pair of LEDs labeled LD1 is controlledby processor 220 to indicate a self-test failure (including a testedcomponent failure). Also shown in FIG. 2 is an LED labeled LD2 which ispowered whenever load side conductors 208/210 are connected to line sideconductors 202/204 through relay 206.

According to UL 943, the GFCI must detect faults occurring in either AChalf-cycle, and the GFCI should trip when there is a fault of 6 mA ormore in either direction, and should not trip when the fault is lessthan 4 mA. These requirements apply over an ambient temperature range of−35 C/+66 C with a maximum load of 20 A.

An SCR (e.g., SCR 218 in FIG. 2) was described above as an example of aswitching mechanism to activate the solenoid that controls thedisconnection of the relay contacts. An SCR may be used due to itshigher robustness, lower cost and smaller size as compared with otherswitching mechanisms such as MOSFET or IJBT transistors.

The GFCI chip (e.g., IC 214 in FIG. 2) may detect a fault and generatean SCR firing pulse at either polarity of the AC line. A fault detectedat either polarity should turn on the SCR. However, an SCR can be turnedon and latched only at one polarity of an AC voltage applied to theanode of the SCR.

One option is to locate the SCR inside the diode bridge of therectifier, as shown in FIG. 2, so that it may be turned on at eitherline polarity. To shut the SCR off again, current through the SCR mustfall below the holding current threshold. However, when the SCR isinside the bridge, the current through the SCR may not fall below thethreshold due to the phase shift between current and voltage, and some“backup” current from GFCI circuitry taking energy from the same bridge.This may be especially true at high ambient temperatures.

Another option is to locate the SCR outside the bridge of the rectifier,as shown in FIG. 3, with AC voltage at the anode. In this configuration,commutation of the SCR may be more reliable. In some such designs usinga half wave rectifier, it is also possible to test SCR integrity inself-test devices during the half cycle when the SCR cannot latch. If,however, there is an offset in the GFCI chip amplifier at the faultlevel between 4 and 6 mA, the GFCI chip may detect a fault and generatea trigger pulse at a first half-cycle but not at a second half-cycle ofopposite polarity. Offset is difficult to avoid, due to the tolerancesin magnetic properties of the current sensors over the temperaturerange, for example. Thus, if the first half-cycle happens to be the onein which the SCR cannot latch, the GFCI will not trip even though afault was detected. Moreover, there is a resulting undesirable asymmetryin the actual fault detection levels.

To ensure that the SCR is turned on for a failure detected in eitherpolarity, the GFCI IC output (e.g., output 216 in FIG. 2) may bemonitored by the processor (e.g., processor 220). When the processorsees an assertion of the IC output to the SCR, the processor can ensurethat the SCR latches. The processor may monitor one or more voltages orcurrents in the GFCI circuitry to identify whether the SCR was latched,and if not, cause the SCR to latch at the next half-cycle.Alternatively, the processor may monitor the half-cycle polarity, and ifthe IC asserts the output to the SCR during a half-cycle in which theSCR cannot respond, the processor causes the SCR to latch at the nexthalf-cycle. If the processor doesn't have information about the polarityof the AC voltage, the processor can attempt to cause the SCR to latchduring two consecutive half-cycles (or two half-cycles separated by aneven number of half-cycles).

In one embodiment, the same processor pin which is used to block the SCRfrom triggering during self-test may be used to trigger the SCR.Alternatively, a separate processor pin may be used.

An embodiment of the disclosure relates to a non-transitorycomputer-readable storage medium having computer code thereon forperforming various computer-implemented operations. The term“computer-readable storage medium” is used herein to include any mediumthat is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions orcomputer codes for performing the operations, methodologies, andtechniques described herein. The media and computer code may be thosespecially designed and constructed for the purposes of the embodimentsof the disclosure, or they may be of the kind well known and availableto those having skill in the computer software arts. Examples ofcomputer-readable storage media include, but are not limited to:magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape;optical media such as CD-ROMs and holographic devices; magneto-opticalmedia such as optical disks; and hardware devices that are speciallyconfigured to store and execute program code, such as ASICs,programmable logic devices (PLDs), and ROM and RAM devices. In theembodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3, processor 220 may execute code stored ininternal memory, or code stored in a storage medium (e.g., flash memory)within GFCI 200/300.

Examples of computer code include machine code, such as produced by acompiler, and files containing higher-level code that are executed by acomputer using an interpreter or a compiler. For example, an embodimentof the disclosure may be implemented using Java, C++, or otherobject-oriented programming language and development tools. Additionalexamples of computer code include encrypted code and compressed code.Moreover, an embodiment of the disclosure may be downloaded as acomputer program product, which may be transferred from a remotecomputer (e.g., a server computer) to a requesting computer (e.g., aclient computer or a different server computer) via a transmissionchannel. Another embodiment of the disclosure may be implemented inhardwired circuitry in place of, or in combination with,machine-executable software instructions.

Thus is described a GFCI which detects faults of line side conductors,and disconnects load side conductors from line side conductors upondetection of a fault. Also described is the self-test capability of theGFCI, in which the GFCI tests its fault detection function by simulatinga line side conductor fault and determining whether the fault isproperly detected, and tests various components of the GFCI for properoperation. The GFCI includes various mechanisms for entering a knownstate upon the occurrence of certain component failures. The GFCIfurther includes a reset lockout to prevent return from a reset, such asto prevent power supply to the load under certain conditions (e.g., theGFCI cannot respond to a ground fault).

The GFCI has been described for the monitoring of two conductors.However, the GFCI may alternatively monitor one, three, or more thanthree conductors, and the self-test may simulate a fault on any one ormore conductor.

While the disclosure has been described with reference to the specificembodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the artthat various changes may be made and equivalents may be substitutedwithout departing from the true spirit and scope of the disclosure asdefined by the appended claims. In addition, many modifications may bemade to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter,method, operation or operations, to the objective, spirit and scope ofthe disclosure. All such modifications are intended to be within thescope of the claims appended hereto. In particular, while certainmethods may have been described with reference to particular operationsperformed in a particular order, it will be understood that theseoperations may be combined, sub-divided, or re-ordered to form anequivalent method without departing from the teachings of thedisclosure. Accordingly, unless specifically indicated herein, the orderand grouping of the operations is not a limitation of the disclosure.

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus, comprising: an interruption circuitelectrically connected in a power delivery path, the power delivery pathincluding a phase conductive path and a neutral conductive path; a faultdetection circuit coupled to the interruption circuit and configured toprovide a fault signal to selectively cause the interruption circuit tointerrupt power delivery in at least one of the phase conductive pathand the neutral conductive path, wherein the fault detection circuitincludes a sensing coil configured to sense a differential currentbetween the phase conductive path and the neutral conductive path, andfurther includes a comparator-type fault detection integrated circuit(IC) that compares the differential current to a threshold; a faultsimulation circuit; and a processor coupled to the fault simulationcircuit and the fault detection circuit, the processor configured toselectively control the fault simulation circuit to simulate a fault inthe power delivery path; detect a response of the fault detectioncircuit to the simulated fault; and determine if the response of thefault detection circuit is an expected response; wherein the processorprovides an override signal to the interruption circuit to prevent theinterruption circuit from receiving a fault signal from the faultdetection circuit during, and for a predetermined time after, thesimulated fault.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor ispowered from the line side conductors.
 3. The apparatus of claim 1, theprocessor further configured to: receive an indication that the faultdetection circuit has provided the fault signal; receive an indicationthat a reset button has been pushed; initiate a self-test including afault simulation; and if the self-test passes, provide a release signalto an electronic switch component to unlatch and thereby allow theinterruption circuit to remove an interruption of power delivery; and ifthe self-test does not pass, prevent the interruption circuit fromremoving the interruption of power delivery.
 4. The apparatus of claim1, further comprising a silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR), whereinpower delivery is interrupted by the latching of the SCR in a conductivestate in response to a received fault signal, and wherein the SCR ispowered from a rectified power signal or an alternating current powerline such that the SCR may only be latched during one power half-cycle;the processor further configured to: receive an indication that a manualreset button has been pushed; initiate a self-test includingself-testing in two power half-cycles of opposite polarity to ensurethat the SCR will latch in response to a fault signal received during aself-test in one of the two power half-cycles.
 5. The apparatus of claim1, further comprising a rectifier, wherein the processor is configuredto, prior to initiating a fault simulation, determine the rate of zerocrossings of an amplitude of the output of the rectifier to identify afailure of a component in the rectifier, and if a failure of a componentin the rectifier is detected, the processor does not initiate a faultsimulation.
 6. An apparatus, comprising: an interruption circuitelectrically connected in a power delivery path, the power delivery pathincluding a phase conductive path and a neutral conductive path; a faultdetection circuit coupled to the interruption circuit and configured toprovide a fault signal upon detection of a fault in the power deliverypath; a fault simulation circuit configured to selectively cause acurrent imbalance between the phase conductive path and the neutralconductive path; and a processor coupled to the fault simulation circuitand the fault detection circuit, the processor configured to:selectively control the fault simulation circuit to cause a firstcurrent imbalance to simulate a fault during a first power half-cycle;and detect a response of the fault detection circuit to the simulatedfault.
 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the processor is configuredto selectively control the fault simulation circuit to cause the firstcurrent imbalance starting at a predetermined time after the beginningof the first power half-cycle.
 8. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein thefirst power half-cycle is randomly either a positive polarity or anegative polarity.
 9. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the processor isconfigured to control the fault simulation circuit to cause a secondcurrent imbalance during a second power half-cycle.
 10. The apparatus ofclaim 9, wherein the first power half-cycle and the second powerhalf-cycle have approximately opposite polarity.
 11. The apparatus ofclaim 9, wherein the end of the first power half-cycle and the beginningof the second power half-cycle are separated in time by an even numberof power half-cycles.
 12. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein theprocessor is configured to control the fault simulation circuit to causethe first current imbalance during a portion of the first powerhalf-cycle and to cause a second current imbalance during a portion ofthe second power half-cycle, each portion beginning several millisecondsafter the start of the respective half-cycle.
 13. An apparatus,comprising: an interruption circuit electrically connected in a powerdelivery path, the power delivery path including a phase conductive pathand a neutral conductive path; a fault detection circuit coupled to theinterruption circuit and configured to provide a fault signal toselectively cause the interruption circuit to interrupt power deliveryin at least one of the phase conductive path and the neutral conductivepath; a fault simulation circuit; and a processor coupled to the faultsimulation circuit and the fault detection circuit, the processorconfigured to selectively control the fault simulation circuit tosimulate a fault in the power delivery path and detect a response of thefault detection circuit to the simulated fault; and a power circuitincluding a solenoid coil, a rectifier, and a first resistor in parallelwith the solenoid coil, wherein the processor and the fault detectioncircuit are powered from a line side of the power delivery path via thesolenoid coil and rectifier, and the resistor is sized such that, if thesolenoid coil is damaged, the resistor will not allow sufficient powerfor proper operation of both the processor and the fault detectioncircuit.
 14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the connection device isan interruption circuit.
 15. The apparatus of claim 13, furthercomprising: a trigger circuit; and a second resistor positioned betweenthe fault detection circuit and the trigger circuit; wherein theprocessor is further configured to monitor a voltage across the secondresistor during a simulated fault, and determine from an amplitude ofthe voltage whether the value of a resistance of the second resistor iswithin acceptable limits.
 16. An apparatus, comprising: a connectiondevice configured to electrically connect conductors receiving line sidepower to conductors providing load side power; a fault detection circuitconfigured to detect faults related to the load side conductors; thefault detection circuit including: a sensing coil configured to sense adifferential current between two line side conductors; and a faultdetection integrated circuit (IC); a processor configured to initiateand control a simulation of a load side conductor fault and determinewhether the fault detection circuit detects the resulting simulatedfault; and a visual indicator, wherein the visual indicator is a firstcolor when power is present on the load side conductors, and changes toa second color to indicate improper operation of the apparatus or afault related to the load side conductors.
 17. The apparatus of claim16, wherein the visual indicator is the output of a light pipe, furthercomprising: a first light emitting diode (LED) powered by the load sideconductors and emitting the first color; and a second LED powered by theline side conductors and controlled by the processor, the second LEDemitting a third color; wherein the light pipe is configured to providea combination of light from the first LED and the second LED as thevisual indicator, and the second color is provided by a combination ofthe first color and the third color.
 18. The apparatus of claim 17,wherein the third color is predominant over the first color, such thatthe second color at the visual indicator is substantially the thirdcolor emitted by the second LED.
 19. The apparatus of claim 16, whereinthe processor is further configured to selectively control anintroduction of a current imbalance between two line side conductorsduring a fault simulation, wherein the processor is configured tocontrol the introduction of a first current imbalance during a portionof a first power half-cycle and subsequently control the introduction ofa second current imbalance during a portion of a second powerhalf-cycle, and wherein the first power half-cycle and the second powerhalf-cycle are separated in time by at least one power half-cycle. 20.The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the first power half-cycle israndomly either a positive polarity or a negative polarity.
 21. Anapparatus, comprising: an interruption circuit electrically connected ina power delivery path, the power delivery path including a phaseconductive path and a neutral conductive path; a silicon-controlledrectifier (SCR) coupled to the interruption circuit and configured tocause the interruption circuit to interrupt power delivery in at leastone of the phase conductive path and the neutral conductive path; afault detection circuit coupled to the SCR and configured to provide afirst trigger signal to the SCR, wherein the fault detection circuitincludes a sensing coil configured to sense a differential currentbetween the phase conductive path and the neutral conductive path, andfurther includes a comparator-type fault detection integrated circuit(IC) that compares the differential current to a threshold; a processorcoupled to the fault detection circuit and to the SCR, wherein theprocessor is configured to: identify when the fault detection circuitprovides the first trigger signal; and provide a second trigger signalto the SCR at a subsequent time.
 22. The apparatus of claim 21, whereinthe processor is further configured to determine whether the SCR is ableto cause the interruption circuit to interrupt power delivery uponreceipt of the first trigger signal.
 23. The apparatus of claim 22,wherein the determination of whether the SCR is able to cause theinterruption circuit to interrupt power delivery includes adetermination of whether the SCR is capable of being latched during apower half-cycle in which the first trigger signal is provided.
 24. Theapparatus of claim 22, wherein the determination of whether the SCR isable to cause the interruption circuit to interrupt power deliveryincludes a determination of whether a voltage at the anode of the SCR isabove a threshold.
 25. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein thedetermination of whether the SCR is able to cause the interruptioncircuit to interrupt power delivery includes a determination of whethera voltage of the phase conductive path is in a positive half-cycle or anegative half-cycle.
 26. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein theprocessor is further configured to monitor voltage or current of atleast one circuit, wherein the determination of whether the SCR is ableto cause the interruption circuit to interrupt power delivery includes adetermination of whether there is a change in the monitored voltage orcurrent.
 27. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the subsequent time isduring an opposite-polarity half-cycle of the phase conductive pathfollowing the half-cycle in which the first trigger signal is providedto the SCR.
 28. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the first triggersignal and second trigger signal are received by the SCR through thesame circuit.
 29. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the first triggersignal and second trigger signal are received by the SCR throughdifferent circuits.